<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>1000heads - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-972cb307" type="application/json"/><link>http://1000heads.disqus.com/</link><description>1000heads: The Word of Mouth People</description><atom:link href="http://1000heads.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 05:58:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Brands must symphonise with our lives</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2013/05/brands-must-symphonise-with-our-lives/#comment-900170739</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Meld not meddle. Spot on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mynameisearl</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 05:58:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are women better at social business?</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2013/05/are-women-better-at-social-business/#comment-895803802</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article Molly, thanks for sharing this new research. I think that beyond 'positive energy and collaboration', one of the key skills in delivering social business transformation and optimising network connectivity is the ability to 'lead together' and demonstrate insight and foresight in equal measures. Add to this the notion of 'co-owning' and 'co-developing' ideas, something experience tells me women are far better at than men, and you start to build a strong case for girl-power!&lt;br&gt;Regards, Stephen&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Cribbett</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 08:35:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your employees are social superheroes</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2013/04/your-employees-are-social-superheroes/#comment-858532484</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great :-) &lt;br&gt;What I still struggle to understand is why some companies allow Facebook, Twitter etc but ban YouTube. Some blame bandwidth hogging. Regardless, pretty short-sighted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mynameisearl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:39:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Your employees are social superheroes</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2013/04/your-employees-are-social-superheroes/#comment-858416008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Molly, glad I inspired you and look forward to being inspired by your talk when we share a stage next week at #TLL6x6 yes grab a ticket before they all go! &lt;a href="http://lc.tl/etll" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://lc.tl/etll&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Grill</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 06:20:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spotlight on social triggers: Signature objects</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2013/02/spotlight-on-social-triggers-signature-objects/#comment-829177885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Molly, I couldn't agree more, and from reading your article I now feel I missed out because I wasn't part of the mail shot which received Sports Direct Mug... I recently wrote a blog which created names for diferent types of 'mugger's', &lt;a href="http://www.pa-promotions.co.uk/blog/give-me-back-my-mug/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.pa-promotions.co.uk...&lt;/a&gt; so are you a 'monogomist muggy' or 'mug magnet'? Will this mug stay with you forever and a day? Happy slurping!  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lisa Ashley Worland</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:39:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spotlight on social triggers: Smiles</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2013/02/spotlight-on-social-triggers-smiles/#comment-805436141</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This article makes me want to move to Russia &lt;a href="http://jacobinmag.com/2013/02/in-defense-of-soviet-waiters/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://jacobinmag.com/2013/02/...&lt;/a&gt; but I guess there's always one... &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Stretton</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:51:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: From cardboard to conversation</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2013/01/nokia-conversations-from-cardboard-to-conversation/#comment-767394264</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great work; loved the 808-scale one. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Whatley</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:19:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What we talked about in 2012</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2013/01/what-we-talked-about-in-2012/#comment-755338888</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Molly.  A comprehensive round up!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Ford</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:46:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CBS Look for Longer: Social media and outdoor advertising</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/12/12388/#comment-731057517</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really enjoyed playing the game on the microsite guys - great work!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Robin Grant</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:51:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 1000heads buzzing after more awards</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/11/1000heads-buzzing-after-more-awards/#comment-723913896</link><description>&lt;p&gt;you're quite welcome :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pat_Charlton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:27:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Australia must wake up to word of mouth</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/11/australia-must-wake-up-to-word-of-mouth/#comment-722161792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks both for your comments.  Very much appreciated! :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, Marianne, the data backs up what *should* be obvious, but it's amazing how many firms will claim that the risk of adopting WOM is too high.  The perception is that it is (usually legally and to some extent, investment-wise) lower risk to maintain a artificially perfect front with the deployment of old-style advertising and PR.  The problem with this, of course, is that this simplistic assessment has failed utterly to consider both opportunity costs (for failing to adopt WOM) as well as the reputational cost of avoiding transparency.&lt;br&gt;John, yes, you're right, we should be targeting the early majority but to some extent, the issue with that in this country is that it can be difficult to articulate the value of particularly real time WOM, partly as a result of time zone issues.  Because the rest of the English speaking world are asleep when we're at work, our WOM projects are really only accessible to other Aussies and New Zealanders, This is a genuine problem, as active users of WOM in Australia are more likely to be active out of office hours.  Thus the value proposition of engaging is often difficult to articulate even to early majority businesses.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know I sound like I'm defending Australian business to both of your comments, but I don't mean to; it's just another challenge we need to overcome, and our approach needs to be a combination of targeting the right users and providing a platform and a context for engagement - preferably during office hours!  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joanne Jacobs</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 22:14:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Australia must wake up to word of mouth</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/11/australia-must-wake-up-to-word-of-mouth/#comment-722088363</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is very interesting, Joanne, because you evidently understand that this is at a meta-level which is distinct from communication about products.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The behavioural change in marketing spending is, itself, an innovation which diffuses though the population of marketing decision makers; and the communication of the advantages and the disadvantages of that change in behaviour follows its own process.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The "early adopters" in Australia are probably already adopting this behaviour from the rest of the world but, for it to "cross the chasm", requires communication of a different kind of information (you've seen my talk about this) targeted specifically to a defined "early majority".&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By travelling, as you have, maintaining your connections, as you do, and by communicating about this, as you are, you are fulfilling an important role as a "change agent" in this meta-process.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John W Lewis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 20:08:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Australia must wake up to word of mouth</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/11/australia-must-wake-up-to-word-of-mouth/#comment-722062320</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great to see data confirming the blindingly obvious - we trust those we trust! I wonder if you asked the sceptics how they made decisions, and how much value they placed on network/friends/family recommendations what their answers would be. Some cognitive dissonance in place I suspect.  And your data confirms what behavioural economists say about trusting recommendations from those we know more than advertising and marketing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">marianne doczi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:15:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I hate gamification</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/11/why-i-hate-gamification/#comment-717399301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I completely agree! Indeed, I wrote a post with exactly the same title (but a business focus) earlier this year: &lt;a href="http://enterprisinglysocial.com/why-i-hate-gamification/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://enterprisinglysocial.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Hughes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 04:47:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I hate gamification</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/11/why-i-hate-gamification/#comment-704247820</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This sentence: '...any word that ugly deserves to die' both reminds me of the day I first met you and also how much I miss you. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Great post :) x&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Whatley</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:05:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: KPIs &amp;#8211; what do they actually mean?</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/10/kpis-what-do-they-actually-mean/#comment-686618409</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a great post and love the sporting analogy. This got me thinking slightly left-field on the topic of KPI's, which I wanted to share and add to the above. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Probably like a lot of clients, I have to set KPI's to almost manage/appease/reach two objectives.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;1. Business objectives / direction&lt;br&gt;2. Upper Management 'management'Often upper management want to see hard and solid returns from social. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some senior managers are accustomed to digital marketing metrics, and even fewer have a real knowledge of social. I think social media KPI's are often a juggling act between a known measurement metric that are familiar to senior managers, and the also the marketing objectives/vision.&lt;br&gt;This doesn't make it right but unfortunately it's the reality of a lot of businesses, and its how a lot of clients have to contextualise their agency facing KPI's. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;TBH I have read / experienced very little that really convinces me that the social media industry has mastered social measurement, it's an area of debate for sure. As a practising marketeer with real targets and financial accountability, I believe we are still in the learning stages. Caveat - I am a social advocate and want us to crack this. For social (and all marketing) to be really understood, then all marketing and customer relations should be driven from one centralised system, where learnings are built up over time on customers / prospective customers across all touchpoints. Only then will we truly know what an action on social really means, be also mindful this will differ drastically for different industries. What does a like mean? What does a follower mean? What does a share mean? How do all of these social interactions affect sales? They can only really be fully understood if we are tracking the full customer journey across all touch-points. Products like Marketo, which integrates with Salesforce are an example of this intelligent way of data marketing. That said, it's difficult to really set accurate social KPI's without doing this, and even harder to feed this information back into ROE discussions with senior managers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Analysis:&lt;br&gt;If a marketing team are doing their jobs properly, then there should be a lot of 'behind the scenes' data analysing and general thinking about what the KPI's actually mean, how they fit in with the marketing objectives, and what is the longer term goal's of the brands overall marketing. For example granular KPI's on social are likely to be different to KPI's for call center agent retention. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is an obvious cross over between the two as they are both customer touch-points and forums to 'save-retain' or 'add value' or 'neutralise'. The metrics of analysis and specifics targets by channel may differ, but the overarching cross-over KPI's in essence can be the same.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's about testing KPI's, being pragmatic about your plan, and re-evaluating the rationale for them on a frequent basis. Oh and measure, measure, measure. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Si Muddell</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 19:38:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Stay aHead: Tablets, SnipSnap and Condition ONE</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/07/stay-ahead-vol-5-tablets-snipsnap-condition-one/#comment-671956978</link><description>&lt;p&gt;IOS app that really sound good, the conversion in any mobile format w.r.t expiry date notification &amp;amp; store detail. its seems consumer discount coupon process more handy and manageable and help consumers in touch with their latest update.. good to know these new things for the beneficial of the consumer. Online shopping stores like &lt;a href="http://www.dealsdiscount4u.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.dealsdiscount4u.com&lt;/a&gt; work tremendously... keep it up&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">HalloweenCostumesCoupons</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 02:05:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lexus: Social Test Drive</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/08/lexus-social-test-drive/#comment-633315119</link><description>&lt;p&gt; Thanks for the question Alex. Sales data wasn’t available at the time of reporting. However, the folks in our community team, who liaised with the social test drivers personally, did continually pick up notes of thanks and positive feedback that the Lexus was now shortlisted for the next purchase.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">1000heads</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:56:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lexus: Social Test Drive</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/08/lexus-social-test-drive/#comment-627586848</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Have they bought the vehicles?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:37:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lexus: Social Test Drive</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/08/lexus-social-test-drive/#comment-626425231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Informative post! Thanks for sharing!  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Enterprise Mobile Hub</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 02:49:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Heads up to our global team</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2010/07/heads-up-to-our-global-team/#comment-610307047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;According to Wayra global director, Telefonica is looking for start-ups that are ... Under Martin-Villa, who heads Telefonica Digital, the group is ... Moreno and his team used to work in the financial sector and, seeing ....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Søgemaskineoptimering</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 08:44:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why the IOC need to stop stifling the social Olympics</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/08/why-the-ioc-need-to-stop-stifling-the-social-olympics/#comment-606516565</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting perspective Joanne.&lt;br&gt;I completely agree that the Olympics is an event that has always brought the world together, and much more so thanks to things like Twitter and other social mediums. I also agre that by censoring certain social media things, it comes off as more of hindrance to people rather than the Olympics trying to make sure it's a good experience.&lt;br&gt;I wonder if they relaxed on some of the "rules" they have if people would be more positive in spreading the good word rather than complaining about what they or others can't do?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, thanks so much for sharing some of our Sysomos data with your readers.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Sheldon, community manager for Sysomos &amp;amp; Marketwire&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">40deuce</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:32:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why the IOC need to stop stifling the social Olympics</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/08/why-the-ioc-need-to-stop-stifling-the-social-olympics/#comment-606203011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From the bizarre socialist borefest of the opening ceremony (save for Mr Bean and Mr Bond) to the empty Olympic seats, (piss-poor IOC organisation) and empty London (so much for boosting tourism and boosting revenues for London businesses) this has been the #WorstOlympicsEver. The control freakery that has abounded makes the Iron Curtain look like a paragon of libertarianism,&lt;br&gt;£25 Billion of crap. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Oliver Deckard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 07:28:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How ELLE and Nokia got fashion bloggers talking about phones</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/07/how-elle-and-nokia-got-fashion-bloggers-talking-about-phones/#comment-602985391</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fakhre</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:53:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Real Network (a project with Royal Mail)</title><link>http://1000heads.com/2012/07/the-real-network-a-project-with-royal-mail/#comment-598930126</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I send therefore  I receive. Such a true sentiment. These days it's too easy to send something without thought and care and this project should remind people how important it is to take time out to make something special for those around us&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andytgeezer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:12:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>